女性与社会研究

在中国式现代化全面推进的背景下，构建契合国家战略需求的人文社科评价体系，已成为深化教育评价改革的关键议题。本文以第五轮学科评估为切入点，系统审视现行人文社科评价指标的成效与局限。研究发现，本轮评估虽在弱化“唯论文”导向、增设文化传承维度等方面有所改进，但仍一定程度上面临分类评价流于形式、本土话语识别不足、动态响应能力薄弱及评价主体单一等结构性困境。基于中国式现代化所蕴含的人民性、自主性、文明性与实践性等价值要求，本文提出第六轮学科评估应推动评价范式从“管理工具”向“发展引擎”转型，构建以价值引领力、学术原创力、社会服务力、文化传承力、国际话语权、可持续发展力为核心的“六力协同”框架，并从细化人文学科分类、强化中文原创成果赋权、建立重大战略贡献动态记录机制等方面探索优化路径。本文旨在为构建兼具中国特色与时代担当的人文社科评价新范式提供理论参考。

Against the backdrop of the comprehensive advancement of the Chinese path to modernization, constructing an evaluation system for humanities and social sciences that meets national strategic needs has become a key issue in deepening the reform of educational evaluation. Taking the fifth round of discipline evaluation as the starting point, this paper systematically examines the effectiveness and limitations of the current evaluation indicators for humanities and social sciences. The study finds that although the current round of evaluation has made improvements in weakening the “paper-only” orientation and adding the dimension of cultural inheritance, it still faces structural dilemmas such as formalism in classified evaluation, insufficient recognition of indigenous discourse, weak dynamic responsiveness, and a single evaluation subject. Based on the value implications of the Chinese path to modernization, including people-centeredness, independence, civility and practicality, this paper proposes that the sixth round of discipline evaluation should promote the transformation of the evaluation paradigm from a “management tool” to a “development engine”. A “six-forces collaboration” framework centered on value leadership, academic originality, social service capacity, cultural inheritance capacity, international discourse power and sustainable development capacity should be constructed. Furthermore, this paper explores optimization paths from the perspectives of refining the classification of humanities disciplines, empowering original research in Chinese, and establishing a dynamic recording mechanism for major strategic contributions. This study aims to provide a theoretical reference for constructing a new evaluation paradigm for humanities and social sciences with Chinese characteristics and contemporary responsibilities.